!C99Shell v. 1.0 pre-release build #16!

Software: Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora). PHP/5.0.4 

uname -a: Linux mina-info.me 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 11 22:57:02 EDT 2006 i686 

uid=48(apache) gid=48(apache) groups=48(apache)
context=system_u:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t
 

Safe-mode: OFF (not secure)

/var/www/manual/mod/mod_python/   drwxr-xr-x
Free 1.34 GB of 27.03 GB (4.94%)
Home    Back    Forward    UPDIR    Refresh    Search    Buffer    Encoder    Tools    Proc.    FTP brute    Sec.    SQL    PHP-code    Update    Feedback    Self remove    Logout    


Viewing file:     intr-performance.html (5.04 KB)      -rw-r--r--
Select action/file-type:
(+) | (+) | (+) | Code (+) | Session (+) | (+) | SDB (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) | (+) |
1.1 Performance


1.1 Performance

One of the main advantages of mod_python is the increase in performance over traditional CGI. Below are results of a very crude test. The test was done on a 1.2GHz Pentium machine running Red Hat Linux 7.3. Ab was used to poll 4 kinds of scripts, all of which imported the standard cgi module (because this is how a typical Python cgi script begins), then output a single word "Hello!". The results are based on 10000 requests with concurrency of 1.

    Standard CGI:               23 requests/s
    Mod_python cgihandler:     385 requests/s
    Mod_python publisher:      476 requests/s
    Mod_python handler:       1203 requests/s


:: Command execute ::

Enter:
 
Select:
 

:: Search ::
  - regexp 

:: Upload ::
 
[ Read-Only ]

:: Make Dir ::
 
[ Read-Only ]
:: Make File ::
 
[ Read-Only ]

:: Go Dir ::
 
:: Go File ::
 

--[ c99shell v. 1.0 pre-release build #16 powered by Captain Crunch Security Team | http://ccteam.ru | Generation time: 0.0032 ]--